Monday, March 29, 2010

Letters-79: Reservation for Muslims

1. The Andhra Pradesh government's plea for quota for Muslims is purely vote bank politics and not for the uplift of backward Muslims in the State. Providing reservation on the basis of religion, which is not allowed under the Constitution, is nothing but dividing the people - Jetling Yellosa, Nizamabad.

2. The Supreme Court order, if validated by the Constitutional bench, will lead to further reservation on religious grounds and cause an exodus of people seeking the benefits of such quotas to those religions. It would be most welcome if the Constitutional bench decides to do away with any such privileges on religious lines - Padmakumar G.Nair, Ahmedabad.

3. Islamic scholars maintain that all Muslims are equal. When this is the case, how can a section of Muslims be categorised as backward class? Some parties want to divide the people on the basis of caste and religion just for the sake of votes. They are adopting the 'divide and rule' policy the British followed to rule India - A.Srikantaiah.

4. The Supreme Court has only removed the Andhra Pradesh High Court's stay on reservation for Muslims. A review of the constitutional validity of the quota is pending. A similar case regarding the validity of Haj subsidy has been pending for more than three years. The court should dispose of both these cases without further delay - N.Ramamurthy, Chennai.

Courtesy: The Letters to the Editor, The Hindu, March 27, 2010.

Grateful thanks to M/s.Jetling Yellosa, Padmakumar G.Nair, A.Srikantaiah and N.Ramamurthy and The Hindu.

No comments:

Post a Comment